captainash: (thinking)
Captain Ash (Asemu Asuno) ([personal profile] captainash) wrote2014-11-10 09:49 am

32nd treasure [text]

So.
I just got around to getting my Pokédex upgraded, and now some of my old data is glitchy and incorrect. Not a lot of it, but still.
Is that known issue? Is there a fix for it?
I mean, it's not that much of a problem, but they should really test those upgrades before distributing them.
codeforhope: (● people searching)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-12 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose...there might be something else causing the problem that we don't know about. They could already have it patched, like you said.
codeforhope: [game sprite] (● don't you know that I)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-12 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
Oh...well, I'm not sure if there is much we can do about that. What with this new type that is around now, and everything...A lot of things have changed, haven't they?
codeforhope: (● don't get too close)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-13 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't thought much about it, myself. Arceus clearly has a lot to do with it...perhaps it was the reason why those new Pokemon showed up a few months ago, too.
codeforhope: (● but I wonder what would happen)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-13 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm...all of that would make sense, yes. I don't think it is the reason we are here, particularly...if that were the case, it would have sent a lot of us back, I think.

[Though...some of them might be better off staying, since they don't exactly have anything to come home to.]
codeforhope: (● sometimes a shadow wins)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-13 04:33 pm (UTC)(link)
People seem to come and go rather often, and without warning, usually. It might just be a random occurrence that doesn't really...connect to anything we can actually explain.
codeforhope: [game sprite] (● anyway)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-14 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm...I couldn't say. It seemed random, at first...but you're right. It does seem to be pretty regular, doesn't it?
codeforhope: (● glance to glance)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-15 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
As things are now, I'm not sure if we'll ever really be able to get all of the answers we are after. What we do think is mostly speculation...unless someone native to this place eventually discovers the cause behind it.
codeforhope: (● there's a chance)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-16 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
What makes you say that?
codeforhope: [game sprite] (● but that's ok)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-16 06:28 am (UTC)(link)
Mm...it seems like this has been happening for...quite a while. Years, right? If they had an answer for it, I would think they would have said something before...but perhaps it has been going on for so long now, it isn't such an oddity anymore.

Do you know what I mean?
codeforhope: [game sprite] (● don't you know that I)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-17 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Yes...if something like this were happening back where I'm from, the frequency of it would have people demanding answers constantly, I would think.
codeforhope: (● look into my eyes ●)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-17 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
When you put it that way...it does raise some questions. There has to be a reason, but I guess we aren't going to figure that out easily.
codeforhope: (● don't get too close)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-18 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
Well, like I said before, I just try not to think about all that too much...if I can help it.
codeforhope: (● but I wonder what would happen)

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope 2014-11-19 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry. Maybe you'll find the answers you are looking for, someday.

[text]

[personal profile] codeforhope - 2014-11-20 02:19 (UTC) - Expand